There’s a fresh debate going on in Norway right, touching right into the heart of aid politics. It all started with a chronicle I wrote that was published in Bergens Tidende on April 28th, entitled Be om unnskyldning, Egeland.
Here are a few quotes from the chronicle that translates to ‘Egeland, you owe an apology‘:
…for despite claims of having acted under good pretenses, a great wrong has been done to a people who have had its leadership publicly discredited on the international scene, its sensitive economy disrupted by an invasion of foreign food distributions and its local food culture ridiculed on international television. An excuse from those responsible would be in place, but now that the tide has turned, the voices of the actors previously so fond of the cameras seem to have gone mute.
…And so I ask: has the man who blatantly took credit for having resolved a famine that never was, nothing to say to his defense?
Esther Garvi, Eden Foundation
The debate that followed can be found here.
Other related articles include:
Media distorts the image of Africa, published in Bergens Tidende on April 29th, 2008
Our prejudices rule, published in Bergens Tidende on April 29th, 2008
Harmful aid, published in Bergens Tidende on April 30th, 2008
Norwegian People’s Aid goes self-critical, published in Bergens Tidende on May 3rd, 2008
…I am sorry for using words and expressions that may have caused misunderstandings. Of course, I do not condone lying.
…It is better, cheaper and more effective to prevent crises, rather than reacted to them. But all journalists think that it is better to write about an [ongoing] aid campaign rather than what is being done to prevent the crisis. It’s a dilemma, for we depend on attention to get money.
…what the researchers must understand, is that we need to finance our work. We use a lot of resources to raise money.
Petter Eide, Norwegian People’s Aid
Aid in crisis, published in Bergens Tidende on May 3rd, 2008
Aid organizations have problems with both communication and action. There is a huge difference between what they say, what they want to do and what they actually get done.
Tarje Iversen Wanvik
Why is Egeland silent? published in Bergens Tidende on May 4th, 2008
There was a crisis in Niger, published in Bergens Tidende on May 4th, 2008
Journalists want the television aid galas to end, published in Bergens Tidende on May 4th, 2008
To watch the Norwegian version of the Famine Scam in English, click here.




2 users commented in " Fresh debate in Norway relating to the Niger 2004-05 Famine Scam "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackOh boy , i want to see where this is going
is Egeland going to apologize ?
come on Egeland react to this where are you
[…] The Famine Scam debate Posted in May 5th, 2008 by Esther Garvi in aid politics Yesterday’s post about the Niger 2004-05 Famine Scam debate going in Norway has been updated with the following […]
Leave A Reply